OwlCyberSecurity - MANAGER

Edit File: 1699081946.M6935P2300384.business67.web-hosting.com,S=8399,W=8560

Envelope-to: revgjkal@business67.web-hosting.com
Delivery-date: Sat, 04 Nov 2023 03:12:26 -0400
Date: Sat,  4 Nov 2023 07:11:45 +0000 (UTC)
From: MAILER-DAEMON@mailout-shared.jellyfish.systems (Mail Delivery System)
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
To: revgjkal@business67.web-hosting.com
Auto-Submitted: auto-replied
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
	boundary="4SMph00JZHz6wdS.1699081905/mailout-shared.jellyfish.systems"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <4SMph147Hnz6xpK@mailout-shared.jellyfish.systems>

This is a MIME-encapsulated message.

--4SMph00JZHz6wdS.1699081905/mailout-shared.jellyfish.systems
Content-Description: Notification
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

This is the mail system at host mailout-shared.jellyfish.systems.

I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.

For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.

If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.

The mail system

<fahimonline@gmail.com>: host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.COM[142.250.105.27] said:
    550-5.7.26 This mail has been blocked because the sender is
    unauthenticated. 550-5.7.26 Gmail requires all senders to authenticate with
    either SPF or DKIM. 550-5.7.26  550-5.7.26  Authentication results:
    550-5.7.26  DKIM = did not pass 550-5.7.26  SPF
    [business67.web-hosting.com] with ip: [63.250.43.82] = did not 550-5.7.26
    pass 550-5.7.26  550-5.7.26  To mitigate this issue, please visit Gmail's
    authentication guide 550-5.7.26 for instructions on setting up
    authentication: 550 5.7.26
    https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126#authentication
    p3-20020a25ea03000000b00d9a5fa4705asi2164976ybd.454 - gsmtp (in reply to
    end of DATA command)

--4SMph00JZHz6wdS.1699081905/mailout-shared.jellyfish.systems
Content-Description: Delivery report
Content-Type: message/delivery-status

Reporting-MTA: dns; mailout-shared.jellyfish.systems
X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 4SMph00JZHz6wdS
X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; revgjkal@business67.web-hosting.com
Arrival-Date: Sat,  4 Nov 2023 07:11:44 +0000 (UTC)

Final-Recipient: rfc822; fahimonline@gmail.com
Original-Recipient: rfc822;fahimonline@gmail.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.7.26
Remote-MTA: dns; gmail-smtp-in.l.google.COM
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550-5.7.26 This mail has been blocked because the sender
    is unauthenticated. 550-5.7.26 Gmail requires all senders to authenticate
    with either SPF or DKIM. 550-5.7.26  550-5.7.26  Authentication results:
    550-5.7.26  DKIM = did not pass 550-5.7.26  SPF
    [business67.web-hosting.com] with ip: [63.250.43.82] = did not 550-5.7.26
    pass 550-5.7.26  550-5.7.26  To mitigate this issue, please visit Gmail's
    authentication guide 550-5.7.26 for instructions on setting up
    authentication: 550 5.7.26
    https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126#authentication
    p3-20020a25ea03000000b00d9a5fa4705asi2164976ybd.454 - gsmtp

--4SMph00JZHz6wdS.1699081905/mailout-shared.jellyfish.systems
Content-Description: Undelivered Message
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Return-Path: <revgjkal@business67.web-hosting.com>
NC-Service-Type: out-shared
Received: from output-router-67f8b8d8fc-tk6dp (unknown [10.35.5.64])
	by mailout-shared.jellyfish.systems (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4SMph00JZHz6wdS
	for <fahimonline@gmail.com>; Sat,  4 Nov 2023 07:11:44 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=business67.web-hosting.com; s=default; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
	Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:From:Date:Subject:To:Reply-To:Cc:
	Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
	Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:
	List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
	bh=QEAUfA92jPaveCtnrKS69LeKGaJwbaoVwnSaulhoslU=; b=HpZDiEGAa2BXmOd1Twxeo/VAj5
	VFrX7z5yV8PrLSpZ6jjhxSNONEVfj9eigLal+giNUCS3IJ6cCUNoDO0LOqr/JfyqFna+O7dXnLKlE
	elO+6BDznwSdAvV9/MK83PjCQAvdnLBUMbo7qDibqQxTEVlE5PK/v8QdXc6JGKHn7t93ksNc501LJ
	Jh7EkqmvWLw04Wokycv8113d2Vgovf8hg3LsymhwqA6hfe9nuAfywdhIjJ3Fo+VkWUflkWDic6y45
	+7JMwTAoAsmyl+D15xoxZeAFD2ktYA9Z+OuvWQQBsZRH5Qe/rHLrpQXD6ViJmfa70BPMa3UqZoOCs
	EVMw9q4w==;
Received: from revgjkal by business67.web-hosting.com with local (Exim 4.96.1)
	(envelope-from <revgjkal@business67.web-hosting.com>)
	id 1qzAop-009fRS-2E
	for fahimonline@gmail.com;
	Sat, 04 Nov 2023 03:11:43 -0400
To: fahimonline@gmail.com
Subject: =?us-ascii?Q?[Revgreen_Pakistan_a_Biogass_Company]_Please_mo?=  =?us-ascii?Q?derate:_"Dairy_Farms_and_Biogas_Plants"?=
X-PHP-Script: revgreenpk.com/wp-comments-post.php for 123.13.60.116, 123.13.60.116
X-PHP-Filename: /home/revgjkal/public_html/wp-comments-post.php REMOTE_ADDR: 123.13.60.116
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2023 07:11:43 +0000
From: WordPress <wordpress@revgreenpk.com>
Message-ID: <fsgzzU0qPI6xRkEA1T7UZosSwcQloyPmHz5OjBj1KeU@revgreenpk.com>
X-Mailer: PHPMailer 6.8.0 (https://github.com/PHPMailer/PHPMailer)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender:  <revgjkal@business67.web-hosting.com>

A new comment on the post "Dairy Farms and Biogas Plants" is waiting for your approval
https://revgreenpk.com/dairy-farms-and-biogas-plants/

Author: Live Cam Show (IP address: 123.13.60.116, hn.kd.ny.adsl)
Email: danielejonsson@hotmail.co.uk
URL: https://Chachurbate.com/
Comment: 
Models who violate a camming site's policies may be 
subjected to a short term or everlasting ban from the <a href="https://Chachurbate.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">Live Cam Show</a> web page.
However, chats are optional, and some broadcasters might decide 
on to stay away from them fully. The regular all-disc brakes with Abs were being outstanding, 
having said that, and inside decor was a mix of Euro-fashionable and American standard.
Antilock brakes had been optional at $936. A new alternative also increased "active protection." Called Traction Assist, it was a very simple 
kind of traction control that relied on the Abs wheel-pace sensors and was so tied to the readily available antilock brakes.
Otherwise, it was common shocks and very simple rear load-leveling suspension, even though the 3-manner 
electricity steering remained standard. Dearborn's personal 
computer nerds widely prohibited a combination of Plush damping and Low steering energy,
but variations were not that fantastic amongst the quite a few doable configurations.
The '95s bought a handful of cosmetic touchups, and the Signature and major-line Cartier gained a new 3-manner power steering system that permitted choosing minimal, medium, or superior steering hard work with the drive of a dashboard button. The 
makeover also launched Ford's Advance Trac antiskid/traction-handle 
program as an alternative and standard curtain side airbags to safeguard the heads of people in the to start with- and 2nd-row bucket seats.

Approve it: https://revgreenpk.com/wp-admin/comment.php?action=approve&c=1616#wpbody-content
Trash it: https://revgreenpk.com/wp-admin/comment.php?action=trash&c=1616#wpbody-content
Spam it: https://revgreenpk.com/wp-admin/comment.php?action=spam&c=1616#wpbody-content
Currently 436 comments are waiting for approval. Please visit the moderation panel:
https://revgreenpk.com/wp-admin/edit-comments.php?comment_status=moderated#wpbody-content

--4SMph00JZHz6wdS.1699081905/mailout-shared.jellyfish.systems--