OwlCyberSecurity - MANAGER
Edit File: 1735633843.M332764P2300878.business67.web-hosting.com,S=4751,W=4856
Return-Path: <> Delivered-To: revgjkal@business67.web-hosting.com Received: from business67.web-hosting.com by business67.web-hosting.com with LMTP id oNilE7Orc2fOGyMAvlQqQg (envelope-from <>) for <revgjkal@business67.web-hosting.com>; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 03:30:43 -0500 Return-path: <> Envelope-to: revgjkal@business67.web-hosting.com Delivery-date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 03:30:43 -0500 Received: from mailnull by business67.web-hosting.com with local (Exim 4.96.2) id 1tSXeF-009p06-0y for revgjkal@business67.web-hosting.com; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 03:30:43 -0500 X-Failed-Recipients: mianarifali@gmail.com Auto-Submitted: auto-replied From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@business67.web-hosting.com> To: revgjkal@business67.web-hosting.com References: <ZLJxgWpprzzOSnrb8FOD0hbd7O8Fa178tKIeeqrZyw4@revgreenpk.com> Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary=1735633843-eximdsn-1204299527 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Message-Id: <E1tSXeF-009p06-0y@business67.web-hosting.com> Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 03:30:43 -0500 --1735633843-eximdsn-1204299527 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: mianarifali@gmail.com host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [142.251.2.26] SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data: 550-5.7.26 Your email has been blocked because the sender is unauthenticated. 550-5.7.26 Gmail requires all senders to authenticate with either SPF or DKIM. 550-5.7.26 550-5.7.26 Authentication results: 550-5.7.26 DKIM = did not pass 550-5.7.26 SPF [business67.web-hosting.com] with ip: [198.54.121.176] = did not 550-5.7.26 pass 550-5.7.26 550-5.7.26 For instructions on setting up authentication, go to 550 5.7.26 https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126#authentication d9443c01a7336-219dca27c81si276052405ad.455 - gsmtp --1735633843-eximdsn-1204299527 Content-type: message/delivery-status Reporting-MTA: dns; business67.web-hosting.com Action: failed Final-Recipient: rfc822;mianarifali@gmail.com Status: 5.0.0 Remote-MTA: dns; gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550-5.7.26 Your email has been blocked because the sender is unauthenticated. 550-5.7.26 Gmail requires all senders to authenticate with either SPF or DKIM. 550-5.7.26 550-5.7.26 Authentication results: 550-5.7.26 DKIM = did not pass 550-5.7.26 SPF [business67.web-hosting.com] with ip: [198.54.121.176] = did not 550-5.7.26 pass 550-5.7.26 550-5.7.26 For instructions on setting up authentication, go to 550 5.7.26 https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126#authentication d9443c01a7336-219dca27c81si276052405ad.455 - gsmtp --1735633843-eximdsn-1204299527 Content-type: message/rfc822 Return-path: <revgjkal@business67.web-hosting.com> Received: from revgjkal by business67.web-hosting.com with local (Exim 4.96.2) (envelope-from <revgjkal@business67.web-hosting.com>) id 1tSXeD-009oyw-1u for mianarifali@gmail.com; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 03:30:41 -0500 To: mianarifali@gmail.com Subject: =?us-ascii?Q?[Revgreen_Pakistan_a_Biogass_Company]_Please_mo?= =?us-ascii?Q?derate:_"Dairy_Farms_and_Biogas_Plants"?= Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 08:30:41 +0000 From: WordPress <wordpress@revgreenpk.com> Message-ID: <ZLJxgWpprzzOSnrb8FOD0hbd7O8Fa178tKIeeqrZyw4@revgreenpk.com> X-Mailer: PHPMailer 6.8.0 (https://github.com/PHPMailer/PHPMailer) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: <revgjkal@business67.web-hosting.com> A new comment on the post "Dairy Farms and Biogas Plants" is waiting for your approval https://revgreenpk.com/dairy-farms-and-biogas-plants/ Author: 福岡 温泉社長 (IP address: 101.33.77.217, 101.33.77.217) Email: NoelMalogh@yahoo.com URL: https://todaypriceonline.com/external.php?url=https3A2F2Fpublic.tableau.com/app/profile/lBxuyYX.lBxuyYX/vizzes/ Comment: The common precept across different types of election inventory markets is that the payouts for a "unit portfolio" of contracts must add up to a fixed amount, usually $1. Approve it: https://revgreenpk.com/wp-admin/comment.php?action=approve&c=4284#wpbody-content Trash it: https://revgreenpk.com/wp-admin/comment.php?action=trash&c=4284#wpbody-content Spam it: https://revgreenpk.com/wp-admin/comment.php?action=spam&c=4284#wpbody-content Currently 3,052 comments are waiting for approval. Please visit the moderation panel: https://revgreenpk.com/wp-admin/edit-comments.php?comment_status=moderated#wpbody-content --1735633843-eximdsn-1204299527--